Forgery in BBC's IRAN-document(c) Mr.K.A.T.
Why BBC got so low?
BBC 2's Thisworld series document "Iran's nuclear secrets" (Paul Kenyon)
was presented in Finlands television channel TV1 on Wed 31 Aug 2005 at 7-8 pm. I recorded it on tape and started to look it just recently. I started to stare at environments in pictures here below because there was no changes at all ! I called my brother to look and we moved videotape forth and backwards but not changes.. Well, I took digital camera Olympus C-765 and took couple photo shot from tv screen. I loaded them in my laptop and started to play with my Jasc's "PSP" Paint Shop Pro 9. Things got more and more vierd as we shall see soon..
THESE PHOTOS BELOW WAS ESTABLISHED AS EVIDENCE OF IRAN'S AIM TO HIDE ITS NUKE PLANTS:
Left picture should expose nuclear plants in Lanatz near Teheran before IAEA asked to check that area. Inspectors of IAEA were not allowed to visit there for months, even though people of IAEA asked many times until months later when everything was cleaned. On film narrator (finnish voice) said "after few months it looked like this" between those photos. Iranian's were said to demolished and cleaned that area. Right photo is said to represent same area some months later than left photo.
Difference of photos (Jasc PSP: Arithmetic Subract) shows clearly differences in "nuke area" but no colour differences in environment. There is "emboss" looklike differences but due to swing of my or bbc's camera because I didn't get my pictures perfect aligned. There seems to be some seasons in Iran, sometimes it is snowing (in document it rained snow as somebody had a speech). So You would suspect even some changes in vegetable, plants wood, roads or parking of cars (not sure but some would be) in couple months. Especially if big buildings is demolished nearby.
Better aligned differential shot of right part of picture. Essentially no differences can be seen. It would be strange if cars, shadows and view angle would be exactly same between photos taken months time lap.
Playing with PSP I then focused on shadows, there was somethgin peculiar, odd.. Well I started to look directions of shadows..
Arrows show direction of sun rays. Red in "nuke factory" and green in environment. Great difference which cannot be explained by natural of perspective laws. From military perspective You'd expect approx. perpendicular arrows but in picture they are not quite. Odd.. also orange arrow+"?" I'll explain those soo below..
Original point of view started to look more and more peculiar and odd. Houses looked strangely cutted pyramids.. Nothing seemed to fit. Finally I invented that photos might have been from different angle. I played with PSP perspective adjustments and I found that those were taken very LOW NEARBY from AIRPLANE. Not from up - not from satellite, as most tv watchers and I had thought. Manipulator had made my transform steps backward and made up picture to look like taken from satellite.
Trees pointed by orange arrow can now be explained. They are single trees on this side of the road (here in right), in original picture they looked like shadows.
But still that "nuke plant" area looks odd to me, perspectively wrong, unbalanced. Ball of bearings roll down from tables in factory or people in environment houses suffer tilted wrong angle beds..
In nuke facilites sun shines from up, but in environment sun shines from right.
Photos of nuclear factory area is bluntly empedded on airplane picture from elsewhere by hand using perspective projection transforming. Picture is forged, made up.
Why BBC 2 got so low ? What are aims of Paul Kenyon and BBC 2? Or are theirs both legs pulled by some agency? If they are innocent then why nobody noticed this manipulation ?
This document is delivered world wide to tv-sets, which may have very serious consequences. Don't BBC have any decency? Sense of responsibility ? It is not just question reputation of appreciated BBC documents (I did too) but also fate of Iran and IAEA.